UNICEF 2007 = Kinderschänderorganisation
Lese heute zum ersten Mal (bewußt), dass UNICEF selbst Teil des "Beschneidung-hilft-gegen-HIV"-Programms ist, zumindest nach meiner Interpretation dieses Briefkopfs:
http://www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/MCrecommendations_en.pdf
Demnach sind folgende Organisationen an der Propagierung der Genitalver-
stümmelung - auch an Kindern* - beteiligt:
WHO, UNAIDS, UNHCR, UNICEF, WFP, UNDP, UNFPA, UNODC,
ILO, UNESCO, WORLD BANK
(*5.2 Where male circumcision is provided for minors (young boys and adolescents), there should be involvement of the child in the decision-making, and the child should be given the opportunity to provide assent or consent, according to his evolving capacity. Depending on the local laws, some mature minors may be able to give independent informed consent. Parents who are responsible for providing consent, including for the circumcision of male infants, should be given sufficient information regarding the benefits and risks of the procedure in order to determine what is in the best interests of the child.)
Und da im Artikel wieder die angebliche 60-prozentige
Reduktion der HIV-Infektionsrate durch Beschneidung auftaucht,
hier eine Rechnung wie die 60% (oder laut Leser 50%) zu 1,8% zusammenschrumpfen:
April 5th,
2007
5:18 pm The answer, Michael, is in lies, damn lies, and statistics. In the
study most quoted, after two years, 22 of the 1,393 circumcised men acquired
HIV, whereas 47 of the 1,391 uncircumcised men acquired HIV. That?s about a
50% reduction in the rate of HIV - over two years. But the absolute numbers
aren?t very impressive: 3.4 percent of the uncircumcised men got HIV, compared
to 1.6 percent of the circumcised men. In other words, circumcision reduced
the absolute rate by 1.8% in two years. That doesn?t sell as well as 50%.
Rarely does any article mention that these rates apply to the study interval,
which was 2 years. People don?t have sex just once: they have it over and
over. In other words, the men in the circumcised group who are at risk for
HIV, over their sexually active lifetimes, won?t do much better than the men
who are uncircumcised.
? Posted by John Kuehne
Dieser und weitere Leserbriefe sind unter: http://empirezone.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/the-question-of-circumcision-and-hiv/ zu finden.
Dass das Kinderhilfswerk UNICEF anscheinend selbst diese Kampagne
unterstützt, finde ich empörend.
So sieht dann also in Zukunft ein Teil der "Hilfe" des Kinder-"hilfs"-werkes
UNICEF für männliche Kinder aus: